Digitální knihovna UPCE přechází na novou verzi. Omluvte prosím případné komplikace. / The UPCE Digital Library is migrating to a new version. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Publikace:
Guilt, Remorse and God: Response to Lynch and Dahanayake

ČlánekOmezený přístuppeer-reviewedpublished
dc.contributor.authorCordner, Christophercze
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-22T08:38:54Z
dc.date.available2019-05-22T08:38:54Z
dc.date.issued2018eng
dc.description.abstractRenewing an old theme, Tony Lynch and Nishanathe Dahanayake have argued that morality is founded in the assumption of an absolute God. They claim that guilt is integral to morality, and that guilt involves the internalisation of a God-figure. Echoing Nietzsche, they argue that in a world without God, morality is in collapse; and that the New Atheism is complacent and mistaken in asserting a simple transition to an objective secular moral standard. I agree that morality has roots widely unappreciated by contemporary secular ethics, but I argue that what they call guilt is a partial distortion of the more fundamental phenomenon of remorse, whose importance to morality need not implicate religion. I explain why.eng
dc.description.abstract-translatedRenewing an old theme, Tony Lynch and Nishanathe Dahanayake have argued that morality is founded in the assumption of an absolute God. They claim that guilt is integral to morality, and that guilt involves the internalisation of a God-figure. Echoing Nietzsche, they argue that in a world without God, morality is in collapse; and that the New Atheism is complacent and mistaken in asserting a simple transition to an objective secular moral standard. I agree that morality has roots widely unappreciated by contemporary secular ethics, but I argue that what they call guilt is a partial distortion of the more fundamental phenomenon of remorse, whose importance to morality need not implicate religion. I explain why.cze
dc.formatp. 94-103eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/phin.12175eng
dc.identifier.issn0190-0536eng
dc.identifier.obd39882223eng
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85029446092
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10195/72797
dc.identifier.wos000418416900005
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.peerreviewedyeseng
dc.project.IDEF15_003/0000425/Centrum pro etiku jako studium hodnoty člověkaeng
dc.publicationstatuspublishedeng
dc.relation.ispartofPhilosophical Investigations, volume 41, issue: 1eng
dc.rightspouze v rámci univerzityeng
dc.subjectmoralityeng
dc.subjectGodeng
dc.subjectreligioneng
dc.subjectguilteng
dc.subjectremorseeng
dc.subjectmorálkacze
dc.subjectBůhcze
dc.subjectnáboženstvícze
dc.subjectvinacze
dc.subjectlítostcze
dc.titleGuilt, Remorse and God: Response to Lynch and Dahanayakeeng
dc.title.alternativeGuilt, Remorse and God: Response to Lynch and Dahanayakecze
dc.typeArticleeng
dspace.entity.typePublication

Soubory

Původní svazek

Nyní se zobrazuje 1 - 1 z 1
Načítá se...
Náhled
Název:
Cordner_–_Published_Version.pdf
Velikost:
57.34 KB
Formát:
Adobe Portable Document Format