Zobrazit minimální záznam
dc.contributor.author |
Forsberg, Anders Niklas |
cze |
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-02-27T03:31:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2018-02-27T03:31:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
eng |
dc.identifier.issn |
1122-7893 |
eng |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/10195/70213 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This paper is an investigation into Iris Murdoch's variety of moral perfectionism. It starts off from Stanley Cavell's reservations against Murdoch's view, grounded in a discussion of Murdoch's famous example M and D. Cavell's principle complaint is that, as the example is set up, there's no reason to think that the mother in law, M, comes << to see herself, and hence the possibilities of her world, in a transformed light >>. This, Cavell argued, differentiates Murdoch version of moral perfectionism from the form Cavell favors. In this paper, it is argued that Cavell has pointed out a genuine deficiency of Murdoch's example, but that he nevertheless misunderstands her position; more specifically of her views of conceptual change, attention, love and perception. |
eng |
dc.format |
p. 361-372 |
eng |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
eng |
dc.publisher |
SOC. ED. IL MULINO |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Iride, volume 30, issue: 2 |
eng |
dc.rights |
pouze v rámci univerzity |
eng |
dc.subject |
Moral Perfectionism |
eng |
dc.subject |
Iris Murdoch |
eng |
dc.subject |
Stanley Cavell |
eng |
dc.subject |
Self-Transformation |
eng |
dc.subject |
Attention |
eng |
dc.subject |
Moral Perfectionism |
cze |
dc.subject |
Iris Murdoch |
cze |
dc.subject |
Stanley Cavell |
cze |
dc.subject |
Self-Transformation |
cze |
dc.subject |
Attention |
cze |
dc.title |
M and D and Me Iris Murdoch and Stanley Cavell on Perfectionism and Self-Transformation |
eng |
dc.title.alternative |
M and D and Me Iris Murdoch and Stanley Cavell on Perfectionism and Self-Transformation |
cze |
dc.type |
article |
eng |
dc.description.abstract-translated |
This paper is an investigation into Iris Murdoch's variety of moral perfectionism. It starts off from Stanley Cavell's reservations against Murdoch's view, grounded in a discussion of Murdoch's famous example M and D. Cavell's principle complaint is that, as the example is set up, there's no reason to think that the mother in law, M, comes << to see herself, and hence the possibilities of her world, in a transformed light >>. This, Cavell argued, differentiates Murdoch version of moral perfectionism from the form Cavell favors. In this paper, it is argued that Cavell has pointed out a genuine deficiency of Murdoch's example, but that he nevertheless misunderstands her position; more specifically of her views of conceptual change, attention, love and perception. |
cze |
dc.peerreviewed |
yes |
eng |
dc.publicationstatus |
published |
eng |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1414/87773 |
eng |
dc.relation.publisherversion |
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1414/87773 |
eng |
dc.identifier.wos |
000416733900007 |
eng |
dc.identifier.wos |
000416733900007 |
|
dc.identifier.scopus |
2-s2.0-85039453050 |
|
dc.identifier.obd |
39880399 |
eng |
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích
Zobrazit minimální záznam
|
Vyhledávání
Procházet
-
Vše v Digitální knihovně
-
Tato kolekce
Můj účet
|