Zobrazit minimální záznam
dc.contributor.author |
Gleta, Jakub |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Teplý, Petr |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2013-07-08T08:28:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2013-07-08T08:28:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2012 |
|
dc.identifier |
Univerzitní knihovna (studovna) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1211-555X (Print) |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1804-8048 (Online) |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10195/49518 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This article focuses on the institutional content and impact of the new Basel Capital Accord, commonly known as Basel III. These rules were enacted in response to the recent developments in global financial markets and to introduce some
substantial changes into established regulatory approaches. We use the method of “process tracing” of the neo-proceduralist school to assess whether Basel III is a victim of regulatory capture or not. We find that Basel III met a number of procedural requirements and is not a victim of regulatory capture. On the other hand, we point to the fact that there remain numerous open issues that could undermine the
as yet unfinished outcome and cause Basel III to join its predecessors in their fate. |
eng |
dc.format |
p. 64-76 |
eng |
dc.language.iso |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Univerzita Pardubice |
|
dc.relation.ispartof |
Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice.
Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration.
24 (2/2012) |
eng |
dc.rights |
open access |
eng |
dc.subject |
banking |
eng |
dc.subject |
basel II |
eng |
dc.subject |
basel III |
eng |
dc.subject |
institutions |
eng |
dc.subject |
neo-proceduralism |
eng |
dc.subject |
banking regulation |
eng |
dc.title |
An institutional analysis of bank regulation |
eng |
dc.type |
Article |
|
dc.identifier.signature |
47940-24 |
|
dc.peerreviewed |
yes |
eng |
dc.publicationstatus |
published |
eng |
Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích
Zobrazit minimální záznam
|
Vyhledávání
Procházet
-
Vše v Digitální knihovně
-
Tato kolekce
Můj účet
|