Ferdinand August z Lobkovic (1655-1715). K jeho funkci hlavního komisaře na říšském sněmu v Řezně (1692-1698)

Foltýn, Tomáš

dc.contributor.author	Foltýn, Tomáš
dc.date.accessioned	2010-12-21T12:18:37Z
dc.date.available	2010-12-21T12:18:37Z
dc.date.issued	2007
dc.identifier.isbn	978-80-7194-929-9
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10195/38052
dc.format	s. 53-72	cze
dc.language.iso	cze
dc.publisher	Univerzita Pardubice	cze
dc.relation.ispartof	Prameny k dějinám Pardubického kraje. Svazek 3, 2007	cze
dc.subject	diplomacie	cze
dc.subject	šlechta	cze
dc.subject	Ferdinand August z Lobkovic	cze
dc.subject	říšské sněmy	cze
dc.subject	diplomacy	eng
dc.subject	nobility	eng
dc.subject	Reichstag	eng
dc.title	Ferdinand August z Lobkovic (1655-1715). K jeho funkci hlavního komisaře na říšském sněmu v Řezně (1692-1698)	cze
dc.type	Article	cze
dc.description.abstract-translated	The purpose of this article is, according to an example of Ferdinand August of Lobkowicz (1655-1715), to contribute to the important activity of Habsburg delegates by foreign congresses and courts. The other sense, especially of the appended edition, is to contribute to the role of court and diplomatic ceremonial in the period of 17th and the first half of 18th century. In the Czech historiography both of these subjects are almost unknown. Ferdinand August of Lobkowicz was a member of one of the most considerable and richest noble families in the Czech lands. After some initial problems with his career at the Habsburg court he entered in 1692 active service by the imperial diet (Reichstag) in Regensburg. He served in the position of Principal Commissarius six years there. After that he became the Hofmeister of empress Wilhelmine Amalia. The published sources are relating to the beginning of his activity at the Reichstag. The first of them is an instruction which was written by the emperor Leopold I. This instruction includes the basic rules and standards how Ferdinand should represent his new status. The second source is an appendix of one of the first letters that Ferdinand sent to Vienna. In these daily records it is desribed what happened during the firtst days after his arrival to Regensburg. Comparing these two sources we can discover to what level the premise of representation was the same as the reality described in the reports. This study was not able in its shortness to gain some detailed answers to the aforementioned questions. More likely it should give a basic notice about the very interesting phenomenon of court ceremonial and important role of the delegates in Habsburg foreign policy.	eng